On
March 11th Staff Sgt. Robert Bales stormed the villages of “Balandi
and Alkozai, in the dangerous Panjwai district of the Kandahar Province” (Massacre
Location). Staff Sgt. Bales entered the villages equipped
with an M-4 rifle with a grenade launcher attachment piece. Bales advanced on
the villages late in the night and went on a rampage. Bales managed to
slaughter 16 people. “The massacre left 16 dead – nine of them children, and 11
of them members of the same family. Six others were wounded, and some of the
bodies set afire” (Human
Slaughter ). Since the start of the Iraq and Afghanistan
Wars no atrocity of this magnitude has been recorded. In fact, this is one of
the worst atrocities carried out be a U.S. Soldier in decades.
![]() |
| Staff Sgt. Robert Bales during one of his four tours in Afghanistan |
After
Staff Sgt. Bale’s rampaged was carried out, he was immediately taken into
custody. After Bales arrest he was shipped out of Afghanistan and held at Fort
Leavenworth, Kansas. Now, it has been months since the attack and on Monday
marked the first hearing of the case in a military court. “At least 35
witnesses are expected to testify, some through live video uplink from
Afghanistan, over the investigation, which could last two weeks or more” (Court
Hearing). Witnesses are coming from both sides of the story, anywhere from
the villagers to Soldiers within Bales Platoon. Afghan officials and the
villagers affected by the attack want to see justice severed. If Bales is
convicted he will face the death penalty. However, Bales’ defense lawyers have
constructed clear evidence to suggest that Bales has a mental deficit and he
was not aware of his actions at the time of the attack. Through a combination
of Bales drinking the night of the attack and his pervious three tours he was
not acting in a rational manner. The stress of these things made him out of
touch with the world. So he might not be at fault for his actions. Even in the
aftermath of the massacre Bales has shown consist signs of certain mental
deficits.
Now
this case is very curious. If Bales was truly under so much stress and
potentially operating with a mental deficit, why wasn’t he pulled out of
Afghanistan earlier? This case could go even further with the ethical issues
underlying how many terms a soldier should serve. Bales was currently in his
fourth tour in Afghanistan, and due to all the stress and exposure from war he
apparently was mentally not in touch with reality. This is what his defense
attorneys are claiming anyway. I feel like Bales should be held accountable but
for future wars no soldier should be exposed to four tours. Especially since the
horrors of war have escalated.
This
court case is going to go on for a few weeks until a verdict is reached. From
my point of view Bales has committed a heinous crime and should be brought to
justice. He has violated many rules of war. First, he violated terms from the
War Convention. Under noncombatant immunity within the War Convention, it
states, at no point are civilians suppose to be targeted or killed. Bales
whether he truly does have a dental deficit or not still killed noncombatants
in the heat of war. For this reason he broke the War Convention and should be
prosecuted for his crime. Also under the rules of war his attack was not
justified under the doctrine of Double Effect. In fact, he broke all four
principles under the Double Effect. His attack was intrinsically wrong, the
intended and direct effect was not towards the good of the war, and his actions
certainly did not have sufficient compensation. In this case of Double Effect
he has failed yet again and should be prosecuted for his crime. An atrocity of
this magnitude should not be acquitted. The defense in Bales case should be
denied, because justice needs to be served.

No comments:
Post a Comment