Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Two Marines under fire after desecration of Taliban bodies



Staff Sgt. Joseph W. Chamblin and Staff Sgt. Edward W. Deptola of the United States Marine Corp are being prosecuted for a stunt they pulled against dead Taliban members. These two Marines were captured on film for urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban members. Now, they are being court-martialed for their exploit act. The incident occurred in July 2011, in Afghanistan. According to CNN, “The incident did not come to light publicly until this past January when a 39-second video showing the incident was posted on several websites, including YouTube”(U.S. Marines Charged). This situation is very profound, because without the use of multimedia these two Marines would probably not be facing prosecution today.
Now, lets take a step aside for a second. I understand that this video clip is probably not fabricated and in fact did occur. But it is very interesting to point out that with all the editing software systems that are available to the market, a video similar to this situation could have easily been tampered with. This can be a scary thought, because Taliban members might be able to fabricate video clips of other U.S. soldiers and get them caught up in a similar situation that these two Marines find themselves in today. With the publication of this video clip some soldiers may feel that they won’t be able to fully express their actions in battle. Now urinating on dead bodies of the opposition, one might see it as an appalling action. But what if a soldier is in situation that will require them to act out in a similar appalling action to defend and save their life. Will they feel that someone could be filming that particular instance and they wouldn’t act in that manner because of the fear of later consequences? Now, this is just a hypothetical situation but what if it means the outcome of life and death of a soldier.
            Back to the issue that is at hand, there are many ethical and moral statements that can be brought to our attention. I understand that urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban members was not an honorable undertaking on these two Marines part. I would like to believe that these Marines and other Marines would hold themselves to higher standards, which they are taught within the Corps. In war situations soldiers who have killed the opposition should respect the bodies of the dead. The ethics and morals in war should be upheld, when killings have occurred. Also these actions by these Marines have placed other Marines and U.S. Soldiers at risk. Since the video has been published on the internet, Taliban members who have internet access can see the actions of these two Marines. In that sense other Taliban members might feel the need to retaliate against U.S. soldiers.
            Even though the actions taken by these two Marines are viewed as unethical in war situations and they should be held to higher standards; I feel it is important to point out that Taliban members on the other hand have taken far worse actions against U.S. soldiers.
            With all that information laid out, what side of the table would you sit on? Should these Marines be court-martialed? Should their actions be seen as heat of the moment expressions of anger, and be excused? What are your thoughts and concerns? 



                                          Video of US marines urinating on Taliban sparks outrage







Bibliography
Craggs, Ryan. "U.S. Marines Urinating On Taliban Video Brings Criminal Charges." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 24 Sept. 2012. Web. 25 Sept. 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/24/marines-urinating-taliban-video_n_1910267.html?utm_hp_ref=world>.

Staff, CNN Wire. "Two Marines to Face Court Martial over Desecration of Taliban Bodies - CNN.com." CNN. Cable News Network, 24 Sept. 2012. Web. 25 Sept. 2012. <http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/24/us/marines-abuse-court-martial/index.html?iref=allsearch>.



Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Taliban Threatens Third Heir to the Throne



Back in 2008 Britain’s third in line to the throne Prince Harry was serving in Afghanistan. While in Afghanistan his tour was cut short due to threats made by the Taliban to kill Prince Harry. Now in 2012 the Prince has been deployed on a four-month tour to Camp Bastion in Afghanistan.  The Taliban yet again made threats to abduct the Prince, and if those attempts fail then they claimed they would kill him. A member of the Taliban, Mr. Mujahid said, “We are using all our strength to get rid of him, either by killing or kidnapping” (Threats to Prince Harry). The Taliban has been very persistent with their demands. In fact, they actually followed through with an offensive.
Just last week on the anniversary of the September 11th attacks, the Taliban members used rocket launchers and small arms in hopes to kill the Prince. These Taliban members were able to break the perimeter through a hole cut in the border fence protecting Camp Bastion. The Taliban members were disguised as U.S. Army soldiers; fortunately their attack only inflicted minimal danger on the Camp. To Prince Harry’s dismay he was off base on a helicopter mission at the time of the offense. After the offensive was reported, Prince Harry was immediately placed under special watch. Even though Prince Harry came out unscathed, others were not so fortunate. The offensive put into place by the Taliban was halted after three hours of conflict. However, these three hours came at a price. An ISAF stated, “At least two U.S. Marines were killed in the brazen strike late Friday, and six jets were destroyed” (Insurgents Attack). These attacks by Taliban members have occurred in the past and are going to continue into the future.   
            With these future attacks, many critics believe Prince Harry’s presence does not help with the prevention of these attacks. Many people believe that the Prince should be removed from the war zone, because he is not just endangering his life but the lives of other man. Case in point the insurgents attack on Camp Bastion.
            The Taliban has been behind numerous attacks and will continue to find ways for many more attacks as long as the Prince is directly involved on the battlefield. Prince Harry is doing a great service and honor towards his country but is it truly worth the risk? Will his current four-month tour get cut short again, just like in 2008?   



Bibliography

CNN. CNN. Cable News Network, 11 Sept. 2012. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. <http://www.cnn.com/video/>.


CNN Wire Staff. "Source: Insurgents Got onto Prince Harry's Base through Hole in Fence." รข€“ CNN Security Clearance. N.p., 17 Sept. 2012. Web. 18 Sept. 2012. <http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/17/source-insurgents-got-onto-prince-harrys-base-through-hole-in-fence/?iref=allsearch>.


Rubin, Alissa J. "Afghan Insurgents Attack Base Where Prince Harry Serves." The New York Times. The New York Times, 15 Sept. 2012. Web. 18 Sept. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/world/asia/afghan-insurgents-attack-base-where-prince-harry-serves.html?_r=0>.